Sustainable student integration in Lithuania through the principles of sustainable communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/da.2026.2285Language:
LithuanianAbstract
The growing migration of third-country students to Lithuania has increased the need for effective integration strategies in higher education institutions. However, the role of sustainable communication in this process remains insufficiently explored in the Lithuanian academic context. This study examines how sustainable communication principles contribute to the integration of third-country students and the development of social sustainability in higher education. The research applies a mixed methods approach combining a survey of 158 third-country students at Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, a focus group with academic staff, and document analysis. The findings reveal that communication challenges are not limited to language barriers but are also shaped by cultural difference in academic communication norms. A significant proportion of students reported difficulties related to information clarity, accessibility and interaction with local students. The results demonstrate that sustainable communication – based on clarity, accessibility, feedback and cultural sensitivity – can reduce informational gaps, strengthen intercultural interaction, and support both academic and social integration. Sustainable communication should be considered a strategic mechanism for fostering socially sustainable and inclusive higher education environments.
Article in Lithuanian
Keywords:
third-country students, social sustainability, sustainable communication, student integration, higher education, LithuaniaArkoudis, S., & Tran, L. T. (2010). Writing blah, blah, blah: Lecturers’ approaches and challenges in supporting international students. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 169–178.
Baker, S., & Irwin, E. (2021). Disrupting the dominance of ‘linear pathways’: How institutional assumptions create ‘stuck places’ for refugee students’ transitions into higher education. Research Papers in Education, 36(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1633561
Bergman, B., Negretti, R., Spencer-Oatey, H., & Stöhr, C. (2024). Integrating home and international students in HE: Academic and social effects of pair work PBL assignments online. Journal of Studies in International Education, 28(2), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221150117
Brito, E., Neves, M. P., Gomes, N., & Lopes, N. (2025). Inclusion and internationalization: Perception of higher education students. Interchange, 56, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-025-09544-3
Brooks, R., & Waters, J. L. (2011). Student mobilities, migration and the internationalization of higher educaton. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305588
Capriotti, P., & Zeler, I. (2023). Analysing effective social media communicationin in higher education institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 656. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02187-8
Celik, E., Norton, L. S., & Sarrica, M. (2023). The academic integration of international students at an Italian university: Exploring communication channels, feeling of belonging and social support. Psychology Hub, 40(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.13133/2724-2943/17975
Deardoff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.381
Dervin, F. (2023). Communicating around interculturality in research and education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003451938
Glass, C. R., & Westmont, C. M. (2014). Comparative effects of belongingness on the academic success and cross-cultural interactions of domestic and international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.04.004
Godemann, J., & Michelsen, G. (2011). Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1
Harrison, N., & Peacock, N. (2013). Cultural distance, mindfulness and passive xenophobia: Using Integrated Threat Theory to explore home higher education students’ perspectives on ‘internationalisation at home’. British Educational Research Journal Studies in Higher Education, 356(68), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903191047
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paco, A. (2016). Implementing and operationalising intgrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: The role of project-oriented learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.079
Leask, B. (2014). Internationalizing the curriculum and all student’s learning. International Higher Education, (78), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.78.5798
Marcu, S. (2015). Uneven mobility experiences: Life-strategy expectations among Eastern Europe undergraduate students in the UK and Spain. Geoforum, 58, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.017
Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility: Implications for emerging East Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.002
Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474412926
Rienties, B., & Nolan, E. M. (2014). Understanding friendship and learning networks of international and host students using longitudinal Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.12.003
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Xiong, Z. (2006). Chinese students psychological and sociocultural adjustments to Britain: An empirical study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668753
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Dauber, D. (2019). What is integration and why is it important for internationalization? A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319842346
Urban, E. L., & Palmer, L. B. (2014). International students as a resource for internationalization of higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315313511642
Weder, F. (2021). Sustainability as master frame of the future? Potency and limits of sustainability as normative framework in corporate, political and NGO communication. In F. Weder, L. Krainer, M. Karmasin, & L. Krainer (Eds.), The sustainability communication reader: A reflective (pp. 103–119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_7
Wolff, L.-A., & Ehrström, P. (2020). Social sustainability and transformation in higher educational settings: A utopia or possibility? Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104176
Zhiu, G., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A study of the first-year international students at a Canadian university: Challenges and experiences with social integration. Canadian and International Education / Education canadienne et internationale, 43(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v43i2.9253
Downloads
CrossMark check
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
