Darni studentų integracija Lietuvoje taikant tvarios komunikacijos principus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/da.2026.2285Kalba:
LietuviųSantrauka
Trečiųjų šalių studentų migracija Lietuvoje – vis augantis fenomenas, darantis įtaką aukštajam mokslui ir socialiniam tvarumui. Lietuvoje ir Lietuvos švietimo sektoriuje tvarios komunikacijos svarba nėra pakankamai ištirta. Straipsnio tikslas yra išnagrinėti, kaip tvarios komunikacijos principai gali prisidėti prie efektyvaus trečiųjų šalių studentų integracijos valdymo Lietuvoje, stiprinant socialinį tvarumą švietimo sektoriuje. Tyrimo naujovė grindžiama tvarios komunikacijos analizavimu ne tik kaip teorine sąvoka, bet kaip ir praktiniu strateginiu įrankiu, akcentuojant prieinamumą, nuoseklumą, grįžtamąjį ryšį ir kultūrinį jautrumą. Šiame tyrime taikyta mišri metodologija: atliktas kiekybinis tyrimas su trečiųjų šalių studentais (158 respondentai), siekiant atskleisti jų patirtis, komunikacijos ir socialinio tvarumo aspektus; taip pat organizuota tikslinė grupė su švietimo institucijos akademiniais nariais, leidusi atskleisti institucinį požiūrį į integracijos ir tvarios komunikacijos procesus. Papildomai atlikta dokumentų analizė, nagrinėjant Lietuvos ir aukštojo mokslo institucijų strateginius dokumentus, susijusius su internacionalizacija ir studentų integracija. Tyrimo rezultatai atskleidžia, kad tvarios komunikacijos principų taikymas tiesiogiai siejasi su trečiųjų šalių studentų akademiniu ir socialiniu įsitraukimu bei bendruomeniškumo jausmu, o tai sudaro prielaidas darniai ir socialiai tvariai studijų aplinkai kurti Lietuvos aukštosiose mokyklose.
Reikšminiai žodžiai:
trečiųjų šalių studentai, socialinis tvarumas, tvari komunikacija, integracija, švietimo sektorius, Lietuvos aukštasis mokslasArkoudis, S., & Tran, L. T. (2010). Writing blah, blah, blah: Lecturers’ approaches and challenges in supporting international students. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 169–178.
Baker, S., & Irwin, E. (2021). Disrupting the dominance of ‘linear pathways’: How institutional assumptions create ‘stuck places’ for refugee students’ transitions into higher education. Research Papers in Education, 36(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1633561
Bergman, B., Negretti, R., Spencer-Oatey, H., & Stöhr, C. (2024). Integrating home and international students in HE: Academic and social effects of pair work PBL assignments online. Journal of Studies in International Education, 28(2), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221150117
Brito, E., Neves, M. P., Gomes, N., & Lopes, N. (2025). Inclusion and internationalization: Perception of higher education students. Interchange, 56, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-025-09544-3
Brooks, R., & Waters, J. L. (2011). Student mobilities, migration and the internationalization of higher educaton. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305588
Capriotti, P., & Zeler, I. (2023). Analysing effective social media communicationin in higher education institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 656. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02187-8
Celik, E., Norton, L. S., & Sarrica, M. (2023). The academic integration of international students at an Italian university: Exploring communication channels, feeling of belonging and social support. Psychology Hub, 40(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.13133/2724-2943/17975
Deardoff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.381
Dervin, F. (2023). Communicating around interculturality in research and education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003451938
Glass, C. R., & Westmont, C. M. (2014). Comparative effects of belongingness on the academic success and cross-cultural interactions of domestic and international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.04.004
Godemann, J., & Michelsen, G. (2011). Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1
Harrison, N., & Peacock, N. (2013). Cultural distance, mindfulness and passive xenophobia: Using Integrated Threat Theory to explore home higher education students’ perspectives on ‘internationalisation at home’. British Educational Research Journal Studies in Higher Education, 356(68), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903191047
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paco, A. (2016). Implementing and operationalising intgrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: The role of project-oriented learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.079
Leask, B. (2014). Internationalizing the curriculum and all student’s learning. International Higher Education, (78), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.78.5798
Marcu, S. (2015). Uneven mobility experiences: Life-strategy expectations among Eastern Europe undergraduate students in the UK and Spain. Geoforum, 58, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.017
Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility: Implications for emerging East Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.002
Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474412926
Rienties, B., & Nolan, E. M. (2014). Understanding friendship and learning networks of international and host students using longitudinal Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.12.003
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Xiong, Z. (2006). Chinese students psychological and sociocultural adjustments to Britain: An empirical study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668753
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Dauber, D. (2019). What is integration and why is it important for internationalization? A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319842346
Urban, E. L., & Palmer, L. B. (2014). International students as a resource for internationalization of higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315313511642
Weder, F. (2021). Sustainability as master frame of the future? Potency and limits of sustainability as normative framework in corporate, political and NGO communication. In F. Weder, L. Krainer, M. Karmasin, & L. Krainer (Eds.), The sustainability communication reader: A reflective (pp. 103–119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_7
Wolff, L.-A., & Ehrström, P. (2020). Social sustainability and transformation in higher educational settings: A utopia or possibility? Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104176
Zhiu, G., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A study of the first-year international students at a Canadian university: Challenges and experiences with social integration. Canadian and International Education / Education canadienne et internationale, 43(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v43i2.9253
Downloads
CrossMark patikra
Paskelbta
Konferencija
Sekcija
Autorių teisės
Licencija
Šiam kūriniui suteikta „Creative Commons Priskyrimo 4.0 tarptautinė“ licencija.
