Integrating AI into circular supply chain decision-making: a systematic review and conceptual meta-framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2507Abstract
This paper develops a meta-framework for AI-enabled circular supply chain decision-making for sustainability, addressing the lack of an integrated, decision-oriented view across circular supply chain, governance, and AI literature. The study asks which managerial decisions are required across circular supply chain processes and how artificial intelligence can support them. A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted using Scopus, followed by AI-assisted conceptual synthesis. From an initial corpus of 6,718 records, a focused subset of 1,032 studies was derived using circularity, supply chain, and AI-related inclusion criteria. Deductive and inductive coding identified recurring constructs relating to process coverage, decision levels, AI roles, governance, capability prerequisites, and sustainability constraints. The results show that AI-supported circular supply chain decision-making is structured across five interdependent layers: strategic governance, tactical policy design, AI decision support, operational control, and foundational enablers. The framework also identifies a cross-layer governance spine centred on decision rights, auditability, and constraints on triple-bottom-line performance. The study concludes that AI should be positioned as a governed decision-support layer rather than an autonomous technical add-on, and that effective circular supply chain decision-making depends on data quality, interoperability, organisational capability, ecosystem coordination, and sustainability guardrails.
Keywords:
circular supply chain, artificial intelligence, sustainability, decision-making, meta-frameworkHow to Cite
Acerbi, F., Forterre, D. A., & Taisch, M. (2021). Role of artificial intelligence in circular manufacturing: A systematic literature review. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(1), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.040
Biroğul, S., & Şahin, Ö. (2025). Exploring the impact of ISO/IEC 42001: 2023 AI management standard on organizational practices. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research, 5(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.54569/aair.1709628
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303
Fleischmann, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Dekker, R., van der Laan, E., van Nunen, J. A. E. E., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (1997). Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 103(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00230-0
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Guide, D. R., & van Wassenhove, L. (2008). The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research (Faculty & Research Working Paper). Fontainebleau. https://sites.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/doc.cfm?did=19631
Hazen, B. T., Russo, I., Confente, I., & Pellathy, D. (2021). Supply chain management for circular economy: Conceptual framework and research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 510–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0332
International Organization for Standardization. (2006). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 23894:2023 Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Guidance on risk management. https://www.iso.org/standard/77304.html
International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 59004: 2024 Circular economy—Vocabulary, principles and guidance for implementation. https://www.iso.org/standard/80648.html
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Kim, Y. H., Ye, W., Kumar, R., Bail, F., Dvorak, J., Tan, Y., May, M. C., Chang, Q., Athinarayanan, R., Lanza, G., Sutherland, J. W., Li, X., & Nath, C. (2024). Unlocking the potential of remanufacturing through machine learning and data-driven models—a survey. Algorithms, 17(12), Article 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17120562
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Montag, L., Klünder, T., & Steven, M. (2021). Paving the way for circular supply chains: conceptualization of a circular supply chain maturity framework. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2, Article 781978. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.781978
Neri, A., Cagno, E., Susur, E., Urueña, A., Nuur, C., Kumar, V., Franchi, S., & Sorrentino, C. (2025). The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. R&D Management, 55(3), 617–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12715
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Polimetla, J. S., Sindhwani, R., & Bag, S. (2025). A systematic literature review on digital twins in circular supply chain management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 8870–8898. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70038
Raut, S., Hossain, N. U. I., Kouhizadeh, M., & Fazio, S. A. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence in circular economy: A critical analysis of the current research. Sustainable Futures, 9, Article 100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100784
Rejeb, A., Appolloni, A., Rejeb, K., Treiblmaier, H., Iranmanesh, M., & Keogh, J. G. (2023). The role of blockchain technology in the transition toward the circular economy: Findings from a systematic literature review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 17, Article 200126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200126
Rejeb, A., Suhaiza, Z., Rejeb, K., Seuring, S., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). The Internet of Things and the circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 350, Article 131439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131439
Schultz, F. C., Everding, S., & Pies, I. (2021). Circular supply chain governance: A qualitative-empirical study of the European polyurethane industry to facilitate functional circular supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, Article 128445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128445
Shahsavani, I., & Goli, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of circular supply chain network design: Application of optimization models. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(10), 23483–23514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03362-2
Thierry, M., Salomon, M., Van Nunen, J., & Van Wassenhove, L. (1995). Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review, 37(2), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165792
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Vegter, D., Van Hillegersberg, J., & Olthaar, M. (2020). Supply chains in circular business models: Processes and performance objectives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, Article 105046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105046
Downloads
CrossMark check
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
