Beyond e-government: reconsidering the GovTech paradigm in stimulating R&D and innovation in the context of the twin transition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2442Abstract
The aim of this Article is to reconsider the GovTech paradigm beyond its common positioning as an extension of e-government, to identify the main mechanisms through which GovTech may shape business R&D and innovation, and to develop a preliminary conceptual framework for further research in the context of the twin (digital and green) transition. Building on a structured literature review of key conceptual and policy-oriented sources, the paper analyses GovTech through three interconnected perspectives: (1) innovation governance and the state’s evolving role from service provider to market shaper and first customer; (2) data-driven and technology-enabled public sector innovation, including data governance, open data ecosystems, AI adoption, and experimentation instruments such as sandboxes; and (3) ecosystem-based public-private collaboration mechanisms, through which public sector demand and procurement are used to encourage firms to develop innovative solutions. The review suggests that GovTech is defined inconsistently and that links between GovTech instruments and business R&D and innovation outcomes remain insufficiently clarified, particularly when twin transition goals are treated as constraints rather than strategic drivers. The Article concludes by formulating a focused problem statement and outlining a preliminary conceptual framework for subsequent empirical research on GovTech and business innovation.
Keywords:
GovTech, twin transition, public sector innovation, innovation-oriented procurement, data governance, ecosystem collaboration, business R&DHow to Cite
Aklilu, A., Dussaux, D., & Verrier, A. (2025). Quantifying digital innovation for the twin transition: Historical trends, current landscape and links with environmental innovation (OECD Environment Working Papers No. 261). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8cc4cff0-en
Bharosa, N. (2022). The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), Article 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101692
Boechat, G., Cunha, M. A., & Gasser, U. (2023). Public procurement and technology: A research agenda. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ’23) (pp. 168–176). ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614321.3614341
Chen, X., Ge, E., Xu, X., & Zhou, Q. (2025). Does digitalization of government activities improve business environment? The influence of public service standardization. Economic Analysis and Policy, 87, 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.05.034
Chiappinelli, O., Giuffrida, L. M., & Spagnolo, G. (2025). Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 100, Article 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103157
Corrales-Garay, D., Mora-Valentín, E.-M., & Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. (2019). Open data for open innovation: An analysis of literature characteristics. Future Internet, 11(3), Article 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11030077
Demircioglu, M. A., & Vivona, R. (2021). Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: An empirical study. Policy and Society, 40(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1955465
Faggian, A., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2025). Regions facing the ‘twin transition’: Combining regional green and digital innovations. Regional Studies, 59(1), Article 2398555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2398555
Fazio, G., Maioli, S., & Rujimora, N. (2025). The twin innovation transitions of European regions. Regional Studies, 59(1), Article 2309176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2309176
Grimbert, S. F., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., & Valovirta, V. (2024). Transformative public procurement for innovation: Ordinary, dynamic and functional capabilities. Public Management Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2326079
Guenduez, A. A., Demircioglu, M. A., Mueller, E. M., & Cinar, E. (2025). Digital innovation strategies in the public sector. Research Policy, 54(8), Article 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Kovacic, Z., García Casañas, C., Argüelles, L., Yáñez Serrano, P., Ribera-Fumaz, R., Prause, L., & March, H. (2024). The twin green and digital transition: High-level policy or science fiction? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 7(6), 2251–2278. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241258046
Kundu, O., Uyarra, E., Ortega-Argiles, R., Tirado, M. M., Kitsos, T., & Yuan, P.-Y. (2025). Impacts of policy-driven public procurement: A methodological review. Science and Public Policy, 52(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae058
Lustosa, R. A. V., Oliveira, A. B. da S., Rodriguez, M. V. R. y, Ramos Filho, A. da C., & Renault, T. B. (2025). Beyond the toolkit: A systematic review of the public procurement of innovation processes. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 59(4), e2025–0026. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220250026x
Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), Article 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774
Mazzucato, M. (2017). Public financing of innovation: New questions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw036
Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
Menéndez, M. de las M., & Lavopa, A. (2025). Adoption of twin transition technologies in developing countries: A bivariate analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 35, 759–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-025-00910-z
Patrucco, A. S., Dimand, A. M., Agasisti, T., Benedetti, M., Gaeta, M., & Tangi, L. (2025). Managing public sector innovation for a better society: The case of public procurement of innovation. Production Planning & Control, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2025.2475286
Sein, Y., & Prokop, V. (2023). The effects of demand-side policy on firm innovation: The mediating role of R&D activities. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 24, 1211–1218. https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.2.1444
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). The path to becoming a data-driven public sector. OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/059814a7-en
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Regulatory sandboxes in artificial intelligence (OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 356). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8f80a0e6-en
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Enabling digital innovation in government: The OECD GovTech policy framework. OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a51eb9b2-en
van Ooijen, C., Ubaldi, B., & Welby, B. (2019). A data-driven public sector: Enabling the strategic use of data for productive, inclusive and trustworthy governance (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 33). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/09ab162c-en
Vivona, R., Demircioglu, M. A., & Cinar, E. (2026). Reverse knowledge spillover theory of public sector entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 51, 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10220-y
Zhang, Z., Cao, J., He, Q., & Jin, T. (2026). How digital government development drives corporate digital innovation: The new role of data network effects theory. Industry and Innovation, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2026.2630354
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
