The concept and importance of mandatory rules in international contractual relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2438Abstract
This article examines the concept and significance of mandatory legal rules in international contractual relationships. It analyses how overriding mandatory provisions limit party autonomy and the application of foreign law, functioning as a mechanism for protecting fundamental national and supranational interests while balancing legal openness with the protection of individual rights. The article aims to identify the mechanisms through which mandatory rules operate in contractual contexts and to assess whether a common minimum content of such rules is emerging within European contract law, directly influencing international contractual relations. Furthermore, the article proposes a concept of overriding mandatory rules based on judicial practice. This concept reconciles the flexibility and international orientation of contemporary legal systems with traditional legislative approaches that allow certain national rules to apply directly and without delay, while also explaining how compulsory legal norms interact with considerations of public policy. The findings suggest that mandatory legal rules in international contract law operate not merely as exceptions to the applicable law but as autonomous instruments enabling courts and arbitral tribunals to safeguard the foundational principles of the national legal and social system in international relations.
Keywords:
mandatory rules, mandatory legal rules with overriding effect, contractual autonomy, lois de police, public policyHow to Cite
Agostinho da Silva Martins v. Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA, Case C-149/18, Court of Justice of the European Union, 31 January 2019, para 27, para. 30. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62018CJ0149
André Mazzoleni v. Inter Surveillance Assistance SARL, Case C-165/98, Court of Justice of the European Union, 15 March 2001, para. 28. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61998CJ0165
Barcellona, M. (2020). Ordine pubblico e diritto privato [Public order and private law]. Europa e diritto privato, 23, 925–979.
Bermann, G. A. (2007). Introduction: Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration. American Review of International Arbitration, 18. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3018
Biagioni, G. (2009). Art. 9 (Norme di applicazione necessaria) [Overriding mandatory provisions]. Le nuove leggi civili commentate, 32, 788–804. https://hdl.handle.net/11584/15416
Blom, J. (1978). Choice of law methods in the private international law of contract. Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 16, 230–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0069005800013072
Bonomi, A. (1998). Le norme imperative nel diritto internazionale privato [Mandatory rules in private international law]. Schulthess. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/4.4.1055
Bonomi, A. (2009). Le norme di applicazione necessaria nel regolamento “Roma I” [Overriding mandatory provisions in the Rome I regulation]. In N. Boschiero (Ed.), La nuova disciplina comunitaria della legge applicabile ai contratti (Roma I) (pp. 173–189). Giappichelli. https://conflictoflaws.net/2009/publication-la-nuova-disciplina-comunitaria-della-legge-applicabile-ai-contratti-roma-i/
Carella, G. (1999). Autonomia della volontà e scelta di legge nel diritto internazionale privato [Party autonomy and choice of law in private international law]. Cacucci Editore. http://hdl.handle.net/11586/8002
Chong, A. (2006). The public policy and mandatory rules of third countries in international contracts. Journal of Private International Law, 2, 27–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17536235.2006.11424301
Donovan, D. F., & Greenawalt, A. K. A. (2006). Mitsubishi after twenty years: Mandatory rules before courts and international arbitrators. In L. Mistelis & J. D. M. Lew (Eds.), Pervasive problems in international arbitration (pp. 13–27). Kluwer Law International. https://www.academia.edu/262774/Pervasive_Problems_In_International_Arbitration
Ebrahimi, S. N. (2005). Mandatory rules and other party autonomy limitations in international contractual obligations: With particular reference to the Rome Convention, 1980. Athena.
ERGO Insurance SE v. If P&C Insurance AS; Gjensidige Baltic AAS v. UAB DK “PZU Lietuva”, Joined Cases C-359/14 and C-475/14, Court of Justice of the European Union, 21 January 2016, para. 43. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62014CJ0359
Fallon, M., & Francq, S. (2000). Towards internationally mandatory directives for consumer contracts? In J. Basedow, I. Meier, A. K. Schnyder, T. Einhorn, & D. Girsberger (Eds.), Private international law in the international arena – Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr (pp. 155–178). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-575-9_10
Francescakis, P. (1966). Quelques precisions sur les lois d’application immédiate et leurs rapports avec les règles de conflits de lois [Some clarifications on overriding mandatory rules and their relationship with conflict-of-laws rules]. Revue critique de droit international privé, 55, 1–8.
Franzina, P. (2016). La scelta tacita della legge applicabile al contratto secondo il regolamento Roma I [The implied choice of the law applicable to the contract under the Rome I regulation]. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnational, 8, 221–239. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2016.3257
Franzina, P. (2017). Art. 21. In U. Magnus & P. Mankowski (Eds.), Rome I regulation: Commentary (pp. 820–835). Otto Schmidt. https://www.perlego.com/book/1088615/rome-i-regulation-commentary-pdf
Gineitis, A. (2002). Tiesioginis imperatyvių teisės normų taikymas [Direct application of mandatory rules]. Jurisprudencija, 25(17), 42–62. https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/3640/3432
Guedj, T. G. (1991). The theory of the lois de police: A functional trend in continental private international law – A comparative analysis with modern American theories. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 661–697. https://doi.org/10.2307/840737
Harlow, C. (1980). Public and private law: Definition without distinction. Modern Law Review, 43, 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1980.tb01592.x
Heiss, H. (2009). Party autonomy. In F. Ferrari & S. Lieble (Eds.), Rome I regulation (pp. 1–16). Sellier European Law Pub. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866538573
Jean-Claude Arblade, Arblade & Fils SARL v. Bernard Leloup and Serge Leloup, Joined Cases C-369/96 and C-376/96, Court of Justice of the European Union, 23 November 1999, para. 30. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61996CJ0369
Kessedjian, C. (2007). Public order in European law. Erasmus Law Review, 1, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR221026712007001001003
Lando, O. (1976). Private international law: Contracts. In International encyclopedia of comparative law (II, pp. 200–203). J. C. B. Mohr.
Lorenzen, E. G. (1938). Comparative commentaries on private international law or conflict of laws [Review of the book comparative commentaries on private international law or conflict of laws, by A. K. Kuhn]. American Journal of International Law, 32(1), 189–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2190649
Mayer, P. (1986). Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration. Arbitration International, 2, 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.4.274
Mankowski, P. (2017). Article 3: Freedom of choice. In U. Magnus & P. Mankowski (Eds.), Rome I regulation: Commentary (pp. 87–263). Otto Schmidt. https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504384814-009
Marongiu Buonaiuti, F. (2020). Le disposizioni adottate per fronteggiare l’emergenza coronavirus come norme di applicazione necessaria [Measures adopted to address the coronavirus emergency as overriding mandatory provisions]. In E. Calzolaio, M. Meccarelli, & S. Pollastrelli (Eds.), Il diritto nella pandemia (pp. 235–255). https://hdl.handle.net/11393/268276
Mosconi, F. (1989). Exceptions to the operations of choice of law rules (Vol. 143). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9780792310471_01
Muir Watt, H. (2010). Party autonomy in international contracts: From the makings of a myth to the requirements of global governance. European Review of Contract Law, 6, 250–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl.2010.250
Nygh, P. (1999). Autonomy in international contracts. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/4.4.1065
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Republik Griechenland v. Grigorios Nikiforidis, Case C-135/15, Court of Justice of the European Union, 20 April 2016, para. 68. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62015CC0135
Ragno, F. (2015). The law applicable to consumer contracts under the Rome I regulation. In F. Ferrari & S. Lieble (Eds.), Rome I regulation (pp. 129–170). Sellier European Law Pub. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502010000200015
Regulation (EC) No. 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I). Official Journal of the European Union, L177, 6–16. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008R0593
Regulation (EC) No. 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II). Official Journal of the European Union, L199, 40–49. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007R0864
Regulation (EU) No. 1103/2016 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2016 on the establishment of certain rights for creditors in the event of cross-border insolvency. Official Journal of the European Union, L189, 1–13. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R1103
Ruhl, G. (2007). Party autonomy in the international law of contracts. In Gottschalk, E., Michaels, R., Rühl, G., & von Hein, J. (Eds.), Conflict of laws in a globalized world (pp. 153–200). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511196.011
Sauveplanne, J. G. (1982). New trends in the doctrine of private international law and their impact on court practice. Recueil des Cours, 175. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789024728169_01
Sperduti, G. (1977). Les lois d’application nécessaire en tant que lois d’ordre public [Overriding Mandatory Rules as Public Policy Rules]. Revue critique de droit international privé, 66, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9780792328704_01
United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v. Navigation Maritime Bulgare, Case C-184/12, Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 October 2013, para. 50. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62012CJ0184
Villani, U. (2000). La Convenzione di Roma sulla legge applicabile ai contratti [The Rome convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations] (2nd ed.). Cacucci Editore. https://hdl.handle.net/11385/5247
Villata, F. C. (2008). Gli strumenti finanziari nel diritto internazionale private [Financial Instruments in Private International Law]. Cedam. https://shop.wki.it/libri/gli-strumenti-finanziari-nel-diritto-internazionale-privato-s20080/
Vischer, F. (1992). General course on private international law (Vol. 232). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9780792322481_01
Zanobetti Pagnetti, A. (2008). Il rapporto internazionale di lavoro marittimo [The international maritime employment relationship]. Bononia University Press. https://buponline.com/wp-content/uploads/cicu-zanobetti-digital.pdf
Zarra, G. (2018). Autonomia negoziale e norme inderogabili secondo il regolamento “Roma I” [Party autonomy and overriding mandatory provisions under the Rome I regulation]. Rassegna di diritto civile, 39, 229–255. https://www.iris.unina.it/retrieve/e268a733-85ba-4c8f-e053-1705fe0a812c/Rassegna%20diritto%20civile.pdf
Zarra, G. (2022). Imperativeness in private international law: A view from Europe. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-499-0
Zhang, M. (2006). Party autonomy and beyond: An international perspective of contractual choice of law. Emory International Law Review, 20, 511–561. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1084331
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
