Global uncertainty and ESG risk management: do they alter the association between financial performance and sustainability orientation?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2411Abstract
This study examines the relationship between banks’ financial performance (FP) and sustainability orientation (SO) amid the polycrisis, global shifts, and uncertainty. Drawing on Resource-Based, Stakeholder, and Institutional Theories, we apply Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling to data on 565 listed banks in 2024 across 53 countries to test whether unmanaged ESG risks (UMR) mediate and whether bank size (BS) and country-level uncertainty moderate this association. Our findings reveal a negative direct association between FP and SO. However, FP is also associated with lower UMR, which negatively affects SO, generating a positive indirect mediation effect. Consequently, the total effect of FP on SO is weak and non-significant because these opposing forces offset each other (competitive mediation). Notably, uncertainty adds further context: while it directly reduces SO, it also positively moderates the FP–SO association, indicating that banks with varying profitability levels respond diversely to uncertainty. BS also influences this association, becoming more negative as total assets increase. Overall, our findings contribute to sustainability research by decomposing the FP–SO association: while higher FP is directly associated with lower SO, it also enhances ESG risk management and resilience against uncertainty, both of which pull a bank back toward greater SO.
Keywords:
financial performance, sustainability orientation, environmental, social and governance, risk management, unmanaged risks, global uncertainty, polycrisis, disruptions, banking sectorHow to Cite
Ahir, H., Bloom, N., & Furceri, D. (2022). The world uncertainty index (Working Paper No. 29763). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29763
Aksom, H., & Tymchenko, I. (2020). How institutional theories explain and fail to explain organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1223–1252. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2019-0130
Arco-Castro, M. L., López-Pérez, M. V., Alonso-Conde, A. B., & Rojo Suárez, J. (2024). Determinants of corporate environmental performance and the moderating effect of economic crises. Baltic Journal of Management, 19(6), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-06-2023-0233
Bank for International Settlements. (2018). Stress testing principles. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d450.htm
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), Article 100612. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Belasri, S., Gomes, M., & Pijourlet, G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 54, Article 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100612
Boso, N., Danso, A., Leonidou, C., Uddin, M., Adeola, O., & Hultman, M. (2017). Does financial resource slack drive sustainability expenditure in developing economy small and medium-sized enterprises? Journal of Business Research, 80, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.016
Chistov, V., Aramburu, N., Florit, M. E. F., Pena-Legazkue, I., & Weritz, P. (2023). Sustainability orientation and firm growth as ventures mature. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5314–5331. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3418
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
Close, D. B. (1974). An organization behavior approach to risk management. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 41(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/252046
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Corbett, R. B. (2004). A view of the future of risk management. Risk Management, 6(3), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240189
Cosma, S., Principale, S., & Venturelli, A. (2022). Sustainable governance and climate-change disclosure in European banking: The role of the corporate social responsibility committee. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society, 22(6), 1345–1369. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2021-0331
Cosma, S., Schwizer, P. M., Nobile, L., & Leopizzi, R. (2021). Environmental attitude in the board. Who are the “green directors”? Evidences from Italy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3360–3375. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2807
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, Article 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Davis, S. J. (2016). An index of global economic policy uncertainty (Working Paper No. 22740). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22740
Delmas, M. A., Nairn-Birch, N., & Lim, J. (2015). Dynamics of environmental and financial performance: The case of greenhouse gas emissions. Organization and Environment, 28(4), 374-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615620238
Desender, K. A., LopezPuertas-Lamy, M., & Pattitoni, P., & Petracci, B. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and cost of financing–The importance of the international corporate governance system. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(3), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12312
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
Doni, F., & Fiameni, M. (2024). Can innovation affect the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance issues and financial performance? Empirical evidence from the STOXX200 index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 546–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3500
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Esposito, P., Doronzo, E., & Dicorato, S. L. (2023). The financial and green effects of cultural values on mission drifts in European social enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3115
European Banking Authority. (2025, January 8). Guidelines on the management of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks. https://www.eba.europa.eu/activities/single-rulebook/regulatory-activities/sustainable-finance/guidelines-management-esg-risks
European Central Bank. (2024, July). Draft guide on governance and risk culture. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/framework/legal-framework/public-consultations/pdf/ssm.pubcon202407_draftguide.en.pdf
Ferreira, M. L., & Jucá, M. N. (2025). The impact of sustainable practices on bank returns. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1511
Florez-Jimenez, M. P., Lleo, A., Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Muñoz-Villamizar, A. F. (2025). Corporate sustainability, organizational resilience, and corporate purpose: A review of the academic traditions connecting them. Review of Managerial Science, 19(1), 67–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00735-3
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Furr, N. R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1915–1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211011760
Gonzalez-Ramos, M. I., Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2023). The interplay between corporate social responsibility and knowledge management strategies for innovation capability development in dynamic environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(11), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2022-0637
Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on US firms’ performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 2549–2570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w
Haessler, P. (2020). Strategic decisions between short-term profit and sustainability. Administrative Sciences, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030063
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Gudergan, S. (2017b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Sharma, P. N., & Liengaard, B. D. (2024). Going beyond the untold facts in PLS–SEM and moving forward. European Journal of Marketing, 58(13), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2023-0645
He, K., Bouncken, R. B., Kiani, A., & Kraus, S. (2024). The role of strategic orientations for digital innovation: When entrepreneurship meets sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, Article 123503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123503
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In Advances in international marketing (Vol. 20). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Heubeck, T., & Ahrens, A. (2025). Governing the responsible investment of slack resources in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: How beneficial are CSR committees? Journal of Business Ethics, 198(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05798-6
Jagani, S., & Hong, P. (2022). Sustainability orientation, byproduct management and business performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, Article 131707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131707
Javed, S., & Husain, U. (2021). Corporate CSR practices and corporate performance: Managerial implications for sustainable development. Decision, 48(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-021-00274-w
King, A. A. (2025). Do sustainable companies have better financial performance? Revisiting a seminal study. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 3(2), 88–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311251332904
Kotzian, P. (2023). Carrots or sticks? Inferring motives of corporate CSR engagement from empirical data. Review of Managerial Science, 17(8), 2921–2943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00609-6
La Torre, M., Leo, S., & Panetta, I. C. (2021). Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2132
Lawrence, M., Homer-Dixon, T., Janzwood, S., Rockstöm, J., Renn, O., & Donges, J. F. (2024). Global polycrisis: The causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. In Global sustainability (Vol. 7). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.1
Leuridan, G., & Demil, B. (2022). Exploring the dynamics of slack in extreme contexts: A practice-based view. Human Relations, 75(6), 1167–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211007786
Liengaard, B. D., Becker, J. M., Bennedsen, M., Heiler, P., Taylor, L. N., & Ringle, C. M. (2025). Dealing with regression models’ endogeneity by means of an adjusted estimator for the Gaussian copula approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01055-4
Luo, B., Luo, C., Ge, J., & Zhang, D. (2016). The moderating effects of slack on the relationship between ambidextrous strategy and performance: Evidence from high-tech firms in China. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(5), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1193043
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miller, K. D. (1992). A framework for integrated risk management in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490270
Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Redondo-Hernández, J. (2019). The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on stock prices: Evidence from the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1446–1456. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1759
Miroshnychenko, I., & De Massis, A. (2022). Sustainability practices of family and nonfamily firms: A worldwide study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article 121079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121079
Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-008-0090-y
Niemann, C. C., Dickel, P., & Eckardt, G. (2020). The interplay of corporate entrepreneurship, environmental orientation, and performance in clean-tech firms—A double-edged sword. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2357
Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857811
Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.43479264
Penrose, E. (1959). Theory of the growth of the firm (Chapters 1, 2, and 5). Blackwell.
Ratti, R. A. (1980). Bank attitude toward risk, implicit rates of interest, and the behavior of an index of risk aversion for commercial banks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(2), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885502
Rintala, O., Laari, S., Solakivi, T., Töyli, J., Nikulainen, R., & Ojala, L. (2022). Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance: The moderating role of ambidexterity in logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, Article 108479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108479
San, O. T., Latif, B., & Di Vaio, A. (2022). GEO and sustainable performance: The moderating role of GTD and environmental consciousness. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(7), 38–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2021-0290
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2020). Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320915686
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage Publications.
Sharma, P. N., Sarstedt, M., Shmueli, G., Kim, K. H., & Thiele, K. O. (2019). PLS-based model selection: The role of alternative explanations in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(4), 346–397. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00538
Sharma, P. N., Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Prediction-oriented model selection in partial least squares path modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(3), 567–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12329
She, C., & Michelon, G. (2023). A governance approach to stakeholder engagement in sustainable enterprises—Evidence from B Corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5487–5505. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3432
Soteriou, A., & Zenios, S. A. (1999). Operations, quality, and profitability in the provision of banking services. Management Science, 45(9), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1221
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1329–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2025). Sustainable development goals report 2025. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2025.pdf
Vaithilingam, S., Ong, C. S., Moisescu, O. I., & Nair, M. S. (2024). Robustness checks in PLS-SEM: A review of recent practices and recommendations for future applications in business research. Journal of Business Research, 173, Article 114465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114465
Vallet‐Bellmunt, T., Del‐Corte‐Lora, V., & Martínez‐Fernández, M. T. (2024). Do we have to choose between economic or environmental performance? The case of the ceramic industry cluster. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5815–5836. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2890
Wang, L. (2023). Unlocking the link between company attributes and sustainability accounting in shanghai: Firm traits driving corporate transparency and stakeholder responsiveness. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1273445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1273445
Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A., Abdulrahman, M. D.-A., Pawar, K. S., & Doran, D. (2018). A two-dimensional, two-level framework for achieving corporate sustainable development: Assessing the return on sustainability initiatives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1117–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2055
Yuen, M. K., Ngo, T., Le, T. D. Q., & Ho, T. H. (2022). The environment, social and governance (ESG) activities and profitability under COVID-19: Evidence from the global banking sector. Journal of Economics and Development, 24(4), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-08-2022-0136
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Álvarez-Etxeberria, I., & Aldaz-Odriozola, M. (2024). Corporate social responsibility oriented boards and triple bottom line performance: A meta-analytic study. Business Strategy and Development, 7(1), Article e320. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.320
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
