Divergent circularity in the EU: clustering of recycling, material footprint, and resource productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2408Abstract
In the context of the EU Circular Economy Action Plan, we evaluate the circular economy performance of the 27 European countries over the period 2014–2023. The assessment compiles 6 Eurostat indicators: material footprint, waste generation, municipal and plastic packaging waste recycling rates, resource productivity, and trade in recyclable raw materials. Fuzzy c-means clustering was used to classify countries into performance profiles with overlapping membership. It applied multidimensional scaling (MDS) to visualise temporal dynamics (2014, 2017, 2020, 2023). Correlation analysis reveals that higher recycling rates, resource productivity, and secondary raw material trade are closely aligned, whereas high per capita waste generation often fails to translate into improved circular outcomes. Results reveal strong heterogeneity and a “two-speed” Europe in circularity outcomes. Four distinct clusters emerge: underperformers (e.g., Cyprus, Hungary), transitional but unstable performers (e.g., Croatia, Estonia), average performers (e.g., Italy, Spain), and frontrunners (e.g., Germany, Netherlands), with some leaders exhibiting volatility. The clustering results further reveal that several countries (e.g., Sweden, Finland) occupy intermediate positions with overlapping cluster membership, reflecting structural trade-offs between high recycling efficiency and elevated material consumption. These findings show the need for targeted policy support under the EU Circular Economy Action Plan to help lagging countries catch up and to stabilise progress, thereby accelerating Europe’s transition towards a circular economy.
Keywords:
circular economy, recycling indicators, divergent circularity, resource productivity, clustering of recyclingHow to Cite
Arai, R., Calisto Friant, M., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2023). The Japanese circular economy and sound material-cycle society policies: Discourse and policy analysis. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 4, 619–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00298-7
Bai, C., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2024). Circular economy and circularity supplier selection: A fuzzy group decision approach. International Journal of Production Research, 62(7), 2307–2330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2037779
Bergougui, B. (2025). Circular pathways to sustainability: Asymmetric impacts of the circular economy on the EU’s capacity load factor. Land, 14(6), Article 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061216
Berry, B., Haverkamp, J., Isenhour, C., Bilec, M. M., & Lowden, S. S. (2023). Is convergence around the circular economy necessary? Exploring the productivity of divergence in US circular economy discourse and practice. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(3), 1597–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00199-1
Bezdek, J. C., Ehrlich, R., & Full, W. (1984). FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 10(2–3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7
Bleischwitz, R., Yang, M., Huang, B., Xu, X., Zhou, J., McDowall, W., Andrews-Speed, P., Liu, Z., & Yong, G. (2022). The circular economy in China: Achievements, challenges and potential implications for decarbonisation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 183, Article 106350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106350
Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28981-X
Çalıkoğlu, C., Łuczak, A., & Rašić Bakarić, I. (2025). Fuzzy clustering of EU countries within the Doughnut Economics framework: Social and environmental boundaries. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5576244
Castillo-Díaz, F. J., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Diánez-Martínez, F., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2024). Challenges and perspectives of the circular economy in the European Union: A comparative analysis of the member states. Ecological Economics, 217, Article 108294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108294
Cerqueti, R., Ferraro, G., Mattera, R., & Storani, S. (2025). Combining multifaceted aspects of technology innovations through fuzzy clustering of multilayer networks. PLOS ONE, 20(8), Article e0334138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334138
Claudio-Quiroga, G., Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., & Vanegas, D. (2024). Measuring the circular economy in Europe: Big differences between countries. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 1331–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2925
D’Adamo, I., Favari, D., Gastaldi, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2024). Towards circular economy indicators: Evidence from the European Union. Waste Management & Research, 42(8), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241237171
Desyatnyuk, O., & Ptashchenko, O. (2025). Digital technologies in advancing the green economy opportunities for global business and financial stability. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-78-85
Dogan, O., & Avvad, H. (2025). Fuzzy clustering based on activity sequence and cycle time in process mining. Axioms, 14(5), Article 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14050351
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2010). The circular economy: Definition & model explained. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview
European Commission. (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe (COM(2020) 98 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN
European Investment Bank. (2024). Circular economy overview 2024. European Investment Bank. https://www.eib.org/en/publications/20240104-circular-economy-overview-2024
Georgescu, L. P., Fortea, C., Antohi, V. M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Zlati, M. L., & Barbuta-Misu, N. (2025). Economic, technological and environmental drivers of the circular economy in the European Union: A panel data analysis. Environmental Sciences Europe, 37, Article 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01119-4
Government of Japan. (2000). Basic act on establishing a sound material-cycle society (Act No. 110 of 2000). Japanese Law Translation. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3799/en
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Lehmann, C., Colaço, A., Cruz-Jesus, F., & Oliveira, T. (2023). The circular economy gap in the European Union: Convergence or divergence among member states? Advanced Sustainable Systems, 7(12), Article 2300247. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202300247
Liu, Z., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2018). Are exports of recyclables from developed to developing countries waste pollution transfer or part of the global circular economy? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.005
Martínez Moreno, M. M., Buitrago Esquinas, E. M., Yñiguez, R., & Puig-Cabrera, M. (2023). A global and comparative assessment of the level of economic circularity in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, Article 138759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138759
Mazur-Wierzbicka, E. (2021). Circular economy: Advancement of European Union countries. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33, Article 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00549-0
Milanović, T. (2022). Development of the Waste Management Composite Index using DEA method as Circular Economy indicator: Comparative analysis of EU countries. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(6), 5309–5315. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/139896
National Development and Reform Commission of China. (2021). [Notice on issuing the “14th Five-Year Plan” for circular economy development]. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/tzgg/202107/t20210707_1285530.html
Nazarko, J., Chodakowska, E., & Nazarko, Ł. (2022). Evaluating the transition of the European Union member states towards a circular economy. Energies, 15(11), Article 3924. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15113924
OECD. (2025). The circular economy in cities and regions of the European Union. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e09c21e2-en
Potkány, M., Lesníková, P., Schmidtová, J., Čuláková, M., Gejdoš, M., & Debnár, M. (2025). Indicators of circular economy and their link to performance and competitiveness: Multi-criteria analysis in the EU countries. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01774-w
Remeikienė, R., Gasparėnienė, L., & Bankauskienė, J. (2025). Assessment of the circular economy indicators in the EU Member States. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00719-z
Salguero-Puerta, L., Leyva-Díaz, J. C., Cortés-García, F. J., & Molina-Moreno, V. (2019). Sustainability indicators concerning waste management for implementation of the circular economy model on the university of Lome (Togo) Campus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), Article 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122234
Sato-Ilic, M., & Kuwata, T. (2005). On fuzzy clustering based self-organized methods. In The 14th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ ’05 (pp. 973–978). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2005.1452526
Suárez-Alvarez, M. M., Pham, D. T., Prostov, M. Y., & Prostov, Y. I. (2012). Statistical approach to normalization of feature vectors and clustering of mixed datasets. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 468(2145), 2630–2651. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2011.0704
Ūsas, J., Baležentis, T., & Streimikienė, D. (2025). Development and integrated assessment of the circular economy in the European Union: The outranking approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 38(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-11-2020-0440
Vovk, V., Taşdöken, Ö., Bölük, G., Stratan, A., & Polcyn, J. (2025). Circular economy in the European Union: A prisma-based systematic review and meta-synthesis. Sustainability, 17(3), Article 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031282
Wongoutong, C. (2024). The impact of neglecting feature scaling in k-means clustering. PLOS ONE, 19(12), Article 0310839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310839
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
