DLT‑driven interconnectedness: Bitcoin’s systemic role in Europe’s financial network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2397Abstract
This research aims to measure the systemic risk architecture of tokenized financial ecosystems, focusing on the impact of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) on European financial stability. As institutions increasingly adopt DLT and smart contracts, they form complex interconnections that allow disruptions, such as liquidity shocks, that cascade across the network. While DLT enables new horizons for the financial industry at the same time it introduces risk across different financial networks. This study evaluates the impact of Bitcoin as a primary digital asset on the systemic risk architecture of 29 major European financial institutions. Using a spillover connectedness analysis, the study identifies Bitcoin as a primary net transmitter of systemic risk in the system. Historical data between 2014 and 2024 reveals an upward trajectory in Bitcoin’s volatility spillovers, though this imbalance has recently stabilized toward more reciprocal dynamics. Findings highlight a significant risk asymmetry: Bitcoin injects volatility into the financial network while remaining largely insulated from equivalent systemic exposure. This disproportionate impact underscores Bitcoin’s role in driving systemic fragility, challenging its integration into institutional financial infrastructures.
Keywords:
distributed ledger technology (DLT), spillover connectedness, Bitcoin, risk asymmetryHow to Cite
Adelopo, I., & Luo, X. (2025). Interconnectedness among cryptocurrencies and financial markets: A systematic literature review. Digital Finance, 7, 1119–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-025-00155-2
Ahmed, W. M. A. (2024). On the robust drivers of cryptocurrency liquidity: The case of Bitcoin. Financial Innovation, 10, Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00598-9
Będowska-Sójka, B., Kliber, A., & Rutkowska, A. (2021). Is Bitcoin still a king? Relationships between prices, volatility and liquidity of cryptocurrencies during the pandemic. Entropy, 23(11), Article 1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23111386
Borri, N. (2019). Conditional tail-risk in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 50, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.11.002
Bouri, E., Molnár, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D., & Hagfors, L. I. (2017). On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Research Letters, 20, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.025
Collomb, A., & Sok, K. (2016). Blockchain/distributed ledger technology (DLT): What impact on the financial sector? Digiworld Economic Journal, (103).
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x
European Commission. (2025). A comprehensive framework for crypto-assets and related services to ensure that the Union financial services are fit for the digital age. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/digital-finance/crypto-assets_en
European Securities and Markets Authority. (2022). Crypto-assets and their risks for financial stability (ESMA50-165-2251). https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/trv-article-crypto-assets-and-their-risks-financial-stability
Financial Stability Board. (2024). Financial Stability Board’s 2024 list of global systemically important banks (G SIBs). https://www.fsb.org/
Global Financial Markets Association. (2025). The impact of DLT in capital markets. https://www.gfma.org/correspondence/joint-trades-publish-report-on-the-impact-of-dlt-in-capital-markets/
Hansen, P. R., Kim, C., & Kimbrough, W. (2024). Periodicity in cryptocurrency volatility and liquidity. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 22(1), 224–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbac034
Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.002
Mazur, M., Dang, M., & Vega, M. (2021). COVID 19 and the March 2020 stock market crash: Evidence from S&P 1500. Finance Research Letters, 38, Article 101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101690
Remy, J. O., Seraj, M., & Eyupoglu, S. (2025). Assessing time-and-frequency-domain cross-market volatility contagion: A comparative study of decentralized finance assets and global traditional financial markets. Journal of Modelling in Management, 21(1), 419–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-07-2024-0220
Shu, M., Song, R., & Zhu, W. (2021). The ‘COVID’ crash of the 2020 U.S. stock market. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58, Article 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101497
S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2021). 2021 global & regional bank rankings: Europe’s 50 largest banks by assets. https://pages.marketintelligence.spglobal.com/SM-Global-Bank-Market-Report-Request.html
Wüst, K., & Gervais, A. (2018). Do you need a blockchain? In 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT) (pp. 45–54). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVCBT.2018.00011
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
