NGO activities in changing contexts: a realistic synthesis perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2026.2392Abstract
This study analyzes how the practices and classifications of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are formed in today’s institutional, governance, funding, and political environment. The study aims to explain how, in specific contexts, mechanisms are activated that structure NGOs’ actions and determine their positions in interactions among civil society, the state, and the market. The study uses a two-stage qualitative methodology that combines a literature review and a realistic synthesis approach. The literature review stage structures the literature on NGOs’ operating principles. At the same time, realistic synthesis helps identify the various contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes that explain how institutional, funding, governance, and political environments condition NGOs’ activities and outcomes. The study shows that NGO activities cannot be reduced to well-known types; instead, they are shaped by dynamic interactions between external expectations and internal interpretations within the organization. The study offers a conceptual basis for revising the traditional approach to NGO classification and can contribute to a broader understanding of NGOs in both academic research and policy planning.
Keywords:
non-governmental organizations (NGOs), civil society organizations, non-governmental sector, literature review, realistic synthesisHow to Cite
Anheier, H. K. (2023). Comparative research on nonprofit organizations and sectors: Looking back and looking forward. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(6), 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5
Awuah-Werekoh, K. (2014). Accountability systems of NGOs: Case study evidence from Ghana. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(1), 17–43.
Billis, D. (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V., & Verschuere, B. (2014a). Co-production as a maturing concept. In T. Brandsen, V. Pestoff, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector, and co-production (pp. 1–9). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203152294
Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V., & Verschuere, B. (2014b). On the nature of co-production in public services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 427–447.
Bromley, P., & Meyer, J. W. (2017). “They are all organizations”: The cultural roots of blurring between the nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Administration & Society, 49(7), 939–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548268
Cornforth, C. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011427959
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
do Adro, F. J. N., & Leitão, J. C. C. (2020). Leadership and organizational innovation in the third sector: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(2), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.04.001
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7
Ebrahim, A. (2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. In D. O. Renz (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (2nd ed., pp. 101–121). Jossey-Bass.
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
Forner, V. W., Holtrop, D., Boezeman, E. J., Slemp, G. R., Kotek, M., Kragt, D., Askovic, M., & Johnson, A. (2024). Predictors of turnover amongst volunteers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(3), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2729
Gazley, B., & Guo, C. (2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21433
Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
Linsley, P., Howard, D., & Owen, S. (2015). The construction of context–mechanism–outcome configurations in realistic evaluation. Evaluation, 21(3), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.3.28.e1306
MacIndoe, H., & Barman, E. (2012). How organizational stakeholders shape performance measurement in nonprofits: Exploring a multidimensional measure. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 716–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012444351
Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014561796
McDonough, A., & Rodríguez, D. C. (2020). How donors support civil society as government accountability advocates: A review of strategies and implications for transition of donor funding in global health. Globalization and Health, 16, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00628-6
McMullen, J. S., & Warnick, B. J. (2015). Should we require every new venture to be a hybrid organization? Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12150
McMullin, C., & Skelcher, C. (2018). The impact of societal-level institutional logics on hybridity: Evidence from nonprofit organizations in England and France. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(5), 911–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9996-8
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review – A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl. 1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530
Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2012). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203152294
Phillips, S., & Smith, S. R. (Eds.). (2011). Governance and regulation in the third sector: International perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835074
Prentice, C. R., & Brudney, J. L. (2018). Are you being served? Toward a typology of nonprofit infrastructure organizations and a framework for their assessment. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.4.1.41-58
Ríos Romero, C., Urquía-Grande, E., & Abril, C. (2023). Stakeholder pressure and accountability in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 14(2).
Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., & Sokolowski, S. W. (1999). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
Sanzo-Perez, M. J., Rey-García, M., & Álvarez-González, L. I. (2017). The impact of professionalization and partnerships on nonprofit productivity. The Service Industries Journal, 37(11–12), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1353976
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105
Tacon, R., Walters, G., & Cornforth, C. (2017). Accountability in non-profit governance: A process-based study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(4), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017691637
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Yang, C., & Northcott, D. (2019). How can the public trust charities? The role of performance accountability reporting. Accounting & Finance, 59(3), 1681–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12475
Yasmin, S., & Ghafran, C. (2021). Accountability and legitimacy of non-profit organisations: Challenging the current status quo and identifying avenues for future research. Financial Accountability & Management, 37(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12280
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
