Adhesion between different asphalt binders and aggregate types evaluated using boiling water stripping test in scope of WMA foaming technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.2339Abstract
This study examines adhesion mechanisms in binder–aggregate systems designed to simulate warm-mix asphalt incorporating water-foamed bitumen. The experimental program involved limestone, gabbro, melaphyre and quartzite aggregates, along with four paving-grade asphalt binders (50/70 and 45/80-55) originating from two different refineries. Adhesion performance was assessed using the boiling water stripping test, with residual binder coverage quantified through digital image analysis. In addition, dynamic viscosity measurements of the asphalt binders at relevant temperatures were conducted, and the petrographic analysis of the composition of aggregates was conducted. The samples produced with conventional (liquid) binders were mixed at temperatures representative of hot-mix asphalt production while reduced temperatures typical of warm-mix asphalt technology (20 °C lower) were used with the foamed asphalt binders. With the limestone and gabbro aggregates most of the experiments yielded over 90% residual binder coverage after the boiling test. The melaphyre and quartzite aggregates revealed on the other hand significant differences between the performance of the binders in terms of their type, origin and their form. The foamed binders with lowered mixing temperatures produced on average approx. 5% point lower residual binder coverage in melaphyre and quartzite while in limestone and gabbro the average difference was only 1% point. The source refinery of the asphalt binder significantly affected adhesion outcomes; however, the supplementary rheological and chemical analyses did not fully account for the observed discrepancies. Overall, the findings suggest that the foaming process itself may enhance the water resistance of asphalt binder-aggregate systems.
Keywords:
adhesion, foamed bitumen, warm-mix asphalt, boiling water stripping test, digital image analysis, dynamic viscosity, petrographic analysisHow to Cite
Bairgi, B. K., Hasan, A., & Tarefder, R. A. (2021). Effects of asphalt foaming on damage characteristics of foamed warm mix asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(8), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121997823
Behnood, A. (2020). A review of the warm mix asphalt (WMA) technologies: Effects on thermo-mechanical and rheological properties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, Article 120817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120817
Chomicz-Kowalska, A., Maciejewski, K., & Iwański, M. M. (2020). Study of the simultaneous utilization of mechanical water foaming and zeolites and their effects on the properties of warm mix asphalt concrete. Materials, 13(2), Article 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020357
Chomicz-Kowalska, A., Maciejewski, K., Iwański, M. M., & Janus, K. (2021). Effects of zeolites and hydrated lime on volumetrics and moisture resistance of foamed warm mix asphalt concrete. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, Article e136731.
Cucalon, L. G., Martin, A., Arambula, E., Yin, F., Estakhri, C., Park, E., & Epps, J. (2014). Moisture susceptibility of warm-mix asphalt. In Y. R. Kim (Ed.), Asphalt pavements (1st ed.). (pp. 691–700). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17219
Cucalon, L. G., Kassem, E., Little, D. N., & Masad, E. (2016). Fundamental evaluation of moisture damage in warm-mix asphalts. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18, 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1266765
D’Angelo, J. A., Harm, E. E., Bartoszek, J. C., & Baumgardner, G. L. (2008). Warm-mix asphalt: European practice. Federal Highway Administration. https://international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/pl08007/pl08007.pdf
European Committee for Standardization. (2020). Bituminous mixtures – Test methods – Part 11: Determination of the affinity between aggregate and bitumen (EN Standard No. 12697-11:2020). https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/837d0c9d-b805-4307-8c88-d77f282f5efa/en-12697-11-2020?srsltid=AfmBOorGUpqY0SvB7erdMYmSnfFqg1Z8_Z1O8Gq32BlakvoGwipZ0CMF
Ghabchi, R., Singh, D., & Zaman, M. (2014). Laboratory evaluation of stiffness, low-temperature cracking, rutting, moisture damage, and fatigue performance of WMA mixes. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16(2), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.1000943
Guo, F., Pei, J., Zhang, J., Xue, B., Sun, G., & Li, R. (2020). Study on the adhesion property between asphalt binder and aggregate: A state-of-the-art review. Construction and Building Materials, 256, Article 119474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119474
Ibraheem, N. A., Hasan, M. M., Khan, R. Z., & Mishra, P. K. (2012). Understanding color models: A review. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2(3), 265–275.
Iwański, M. M., Chomicz-Kowalska, A., & Maciejewski, K. (2020). Resistance to moisture-induced damage of half-warm-mix asphalt concrete with foamed bitumen. Materials, 13(3), Article 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030654
Iwański, M., Chomicz-Kowalska, A., Mazurek, G., Buczyński, P., Cholewińska, M., Iwański, M., Maciejewski, K., & Ramiączek, P. (2021). Effects of the water-based foaming process on the basic and rheological properties of bitumen 70/100. Materials, 14(11), Article 2803. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112803
Källén, H., Heyden, A., Åström, K., & Lindh, P. (2016). Measuring and evaluating bitumen coverage of stones using two different digital image analysis methods. Measurement, 84, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.007
Komačka, J., Budjačová, E., & Remišová, E. (2019). Colour-histogram-based assessment procedure of the rolling bottle test considering the drawbacks in the digital image analysis of bitumen-aggregate systems. Materials and Structures, 52, Article 59. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1359-4
Komačka, J., & Remišová, E. (2019). Investigation of the relation between adhesion and water sensitivity test results. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 27(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjce-2019-0024
Nixon, P. J., & Sims, I. (2016). RILEM recommended test method: AAR-1.1 – detection of potential alkali-reactivity –part 1: Petrographic examination method. In P. J. Nixon & I. Sims (Eds.), RILEM recommendations for the prevention of damage by alkali-aggregate reactions in new concrete structures: State-of-the-art report of the RILEM technical Committee 219-ACS (pp. 35–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7252-5_3
Paliukaitė, M., Vorobjovas, V., Bulevičius, M., & Andrejevas, V. (2016). Evaluation of different test methods for bitumen adhesion properties. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.339
Petersen, J. C., Plancher, H., Ensley, E. K., Venable, R. L., & Miyake, G. (1982). Chemistry of asphalt-aggregate interaction: Relationship with pavement moisture-damage prediction test. Transportation Research Record, (843), 95–104.
Phuangsaijai, N., Jakmunee, J., & Kittiwachana, S. (2021). Investigation into the predictive performance of colorimetric sensor strips using RGB, CMYK, HSV, and CIELAB coupled with various data preprocessing methods: A case study on an analysis of water quality parameters. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology, 12, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-021-00271-9
Pucułek, M., Liphardt, A., & Radziszewski, P. (2020). Evaluation of the possibility of reduction of highly modified binders technological temperatures. Archives of Civil Engineering, 67, 557–570.
Rahman, M. A., Ghabchi, R., Zaman, M., & Ali, S. A. (2021). Rutting and moisture-induced damage potential of foamed warm mix asphalt (WMA) containing RAP. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6, Article 158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00528-7
Remišová, E. (2004). Theory and measurements of bitumen binders adhesion to aggregate. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 6(1), 58–63.
Remišová, E., & Holý, M. (2017). Changes of properties of bitumen binders by additives application. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245, Article 032003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/245/3/032003
Rubio, M. C., Martínez, G., Baena, L., & Moreno, F. (2012). Warm mix asphalt: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.053
Shu, X., Huang, B., Shrum, E. D., & Jia, X. (2012). Laboratory evaluation of moisture susceptibility of foamed warm mix asphalt containing high percentages of RAP. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.095
Woszuk, A., Zofka, A., Bandura, L., & Franus, W. (2017). Effect of zeolite properties on asphalt foaming. Construction and Building Materials, 139, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.054
Xu, S., Xiao, F., Amirkhanian, S., & Singh, D. (2017). Moisture characteristics of mixtures with warm mix asphalt technologies– a review. Construction and Building Materials, 142, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.069
Zhang, J., Apeagyei, A. K., Airey, G. D., & Grenfell, J. R. A. (2015). Influence of aggregate mineralogical composition on water resistance of aggregate-bitumen adhesion. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 62, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.06.012
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nordic Geodetic Commission
International Federation of Surveyors
European Sustainable Energy Innovation Alliance
New European Bauhaus Academy
The Lithuanian Roads Association
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association
Bentley
AB "Kauno tiltai"
UAB "Kerista"
UAB "Danfoss"
UAB "EMP recycling"
UAB "ACO Lietuva"
UAB "Arginta"
UAB "Skadec LT"
UAB "GPS partneris"
UAB "Hnit-Baltic"
AB "Eurovia Lietuva"
VšĮ "RV Agentūra"
UAB "GeoNovus"