Analysis of road safety audits conducted in 2024–2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.2265Abstract
The road safety policy of Lithuania and the European Union is based on a shift from a reactive approach, when decisions are made based on the analysis of historical traffic accidents, to a proactive application of the principles of a safe system. This direction was strengthened by the 2019 update of Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, which expanded the scope of application of mandatory road infrastructure safety management procedures, covering not only the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) roads, but also motorways and other major roads. The provisions of the directive have been transposed into Lithuanian legislation, and the amendments to the road safety audit procedure that entered into force in 2022 have established additional requirements for auditors and expanded the scope of the audit to all state and local roads and streets intended for public traffic. The study analyses 47 road safety audits carried out by the VILNIUS TECH Road Research Institute in 2024–2025. 519 road infrastructure safety problems were identified, with an average of 11.04 problems per audit. Most audits (87%) were carried out at the project preparation stage, and 13% – before the road was put into operation. According to the degree of importance, 45% of the problems were classified as medium, 24% – high, 31% – low. The most frequently identified problems were related to road signs and vertical markings (9.09%). When assessing the safety of vulnerable road users, a significant part was accounted for by pedestrian infrastructure problems: inappropriate tactile indicator schemes (5.41%), absence of tactile indicators (4.42%) and inconsistencies in the geometry of pedestrian crossings (3.44%). The results confirm the need to strengthen the control of design solutions and ensure consistent application of regulatory requirements in road infrastructure projects.
Keywords:
directive, road safety audit, road safety, road design problemsHow to Cite
Ahmed, I., Puan, O. C., & Ismail, C. R. (2013). A comparative review of road safety audit guidelines of selected countries. Jurnal Teknologi, 65(3), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2148
AlHamad, S., Almallah, M., Naser, M. N., Alhajyaseen, W. K. M., & de Roos, M. P. (2023). Examining the role of road safety audits worldwide: Exploring road safety experts’ opinions. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 30(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2022.2114090
Calderón Ramírez, J. A., Núñez López, I., García Gómez, L. G., & Montoya Alcaraz, M. A. (2023). Main guidelines in road safety audits: A literature review. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, Article 1282251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1282251
Elvik, R., & Vaa, T. (2004). The handbook of road safety measures (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
European Court of Auditors. (2024). Reaching EU road safety objectives: Time to move up a gear (Special report 04/2024). https://www.eca.europa.eu/ECAPublications/SR-2024-04/SR-2024-04_EN.pdf
European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/1936 on road infrastructure safety management. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1936/oj
Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Lithuania. (2022a, February 17). On the approval of the requirements and procedure for conducting road safety audits (Order No. 3-97). https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/35fa18e08fb811ecaf3aba0cb308998c
Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Lithuania. (2022b, February 24). On the approval of the requirements and procedure for the training, examination, issuance, suspension, lifting of suspension and lifting of validity of road safety auditors (Order No. 3-108). https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/69bb77f0956211ecaf3aba0cb308998c
Tumavičė, A., Jasiūnienė, V., & Kravcovas, I. (2020). Identification and analysis of problems in the implementation of road safety audit in Lithuania. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.475
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nordic Geodetic Commission
International Federation of Surveyors
European Sustainable Energy Innovation Alliance
New European Bauhaus Academy
The Lithuanian Roads Association
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association
Bentley
AB "Kauno tiltai"
UAB "Kerista"
UAB "Danfoss"
UAB "EMP recycling"
UAB "ACO Lietuva"
UAB "Arginta"
UAB "Skadec LT"
UAB "GPS partneris"
UAB "Hnit-Baltic"
AB "Eurovia Lietuva"
VšĮ "RV Agentūra"
UAB "GeoNovus"