Planning priorities for Rail Baltica regional stations: a comparative analysis of passenger and expert perspectives on comfort and amenities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.2262Abstract
Rail Baltica is a key sustainable transport project in the Baltic region. Its success depends on how effectively regional stations function and how well they are integrated into their surroundings. This study analyzes planning priorities for Rail Baltica regional stations based on survey results from both passengers and experts.
Researchers sought to identify essential features of regional stations through two separate surveys. The surveys covered four interrelated groups of station elements: core station building features, access and parking infrastructure, additional comfort elements, and digital and service-related solutions. The passenger survey indicated that comfort, accessibility, public transport integration, and safety are essential criteria. Passengers emphasized the need for public transport stops located close to stations, security measures, and easy-to-use payment options. In contrast, experts focused on long-term sustainability, opportunities for area development, different transport options, and reducing environmental impact. This included safe pedestrian crossings and digital information systems.
The analysis highlighted both shared and differing priorities between passengers and experts, revealing potential planning conflicts and areas where compromise may be necessary. For instance, both groups agreed that public transport integration is a top priority. However, they differed in their views on digital solutions and certain infrastructure features, such as pedestrian overpasses and mobile applications. Importantly, the study does not treat lower-ranked items as unimportant. Instead, it proposes a priority framework to guide the phased development of regional stations, largely determined by plot size and the spatial arrangement of objects within the site. This strategy allows essential passenger-focused solutions to be implemented first, while other important features can be added over time as resources become available.
The findings can inform the planning of Rail Baltica regional stations. The goal is to help balance user needs with the principles of sustainable and flexible infrastructure development.
Keywords:
Rail Baltica, railway regional stations, passenger comfort, survey analysis, infrastructure planningHow to Cite
Abdi, H. (2007). The Kendall rank correlation coefficient. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, 2, 508–510.
Brons, M., Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.08.002
Cats, O., Susilo, Y. O., & Reimal, T. (2020). Intermodality in European metropolises: The current state of the art, and the results of an expert survey covering Berlin, Copenhagen, Hamburg and Paris. Transport Policy, 94, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.011
Eurostat. (2025). Modal split of passenger transport: European Union (inland passenger kilometres). Eurostat Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/TRAN_HV_PSMOD/default/table?lang=en
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Grigonis, V., Kaušylas, M., & Palevičius, V. (2025). Advancing sustainable interoperability between standard and broad gauge railway systems. Sustainability, 17(18), Article 8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188336
Hale, C., & Miller, M. (2012). Amenity and opportunity at rail stations. Australian Planner, 50(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2012.703679
International Union of Railways. (2017). Smart stations in smart cities. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/smart_stations_in_smart_cities.pdf
Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298899
McLeod, A. I. (2005). Kendall rank correlation and Mann-Kendall trend test. R package Kendall, 602, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.Kendall
Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania. (2023). Explanatory memorandum for the Rail Baltica regional stations and engineering infrastructure development plan. https://sumin.lrv.lt/uploads/sumin/documents/files/RB_RS_EBI_Aiskinamasis%20rastas.pdf
Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania. (2024). Engineering systems and regional stations infrastructure development plan for the Rail Baltica railway line Kaunas–Lithuanian–Latvian border. https://sumin.lrv.lt/media/viesa/saugykla/2024/3/uIxXLP0vBzM.pdf
Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities: A review of the current evidence. Environment International, 140, Article 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661
Otsuka, N., & Reeve, A. (2024). Railway stations as public space: How to promote rail journeys via multi functional railway stations. European Planning Studies, 32(5), 973–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2246508
RB Rail AS. (2025). Rail Baltica global project progress in 2025. Rail Baltica. https://www.railbaltica.org/news/rail-baltica-global-project-progress-in-2025/
State Data Agency. (2026). Statistical indicators analysis [Interactive data analysis page]. Official Statistics Portal. https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize?hash=103cad31-9227-4990-90b0-8991b58af8e7
Strien, M. J., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2025). Global expansion of the ecological impact of extra-urban road traffic. Nature Sustainability, 8(11), 1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01637-2
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nordic Geodetic Commission
International Federation of Surveyors
European Sustainable Energy Innovation Alliance
New European Bauhaus Academy
The Lithuanian Roads Association
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association
Bentley
AB "Kauno tiltai"
UAB "Kerista"
UAB "Danfoss"
UAB "EMP recycling"
UAB "ACO Lietuva"
UAB "Arginta"
UAB "Skadec LT"
UAB "GPS partneris"
UAB "Hnit-Baltic"
AB "Eurovia Lietuva"
VšĮ "RV Agentūra"
UAB "GeoNovus"