Capacity evaluation of mixed passenger–freight traffic on high-speed railway line
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.2256Abstract
The research analyzes the compatibility of railway circulation between High Speed passenger trains and freight trains operating on the same infrastructure, with particular reference to the estimation of line capacity according to International Union of Railways (UIC) methodologies. This represents a case of complex compatibility, dictated by the different mechanical and dynamic characteristics of the rolling stock involved. These differences strongly influence the heterotachicity that must be taken into account both in the design and in the operational management of the line, as well as in addressing the problem of calculating and optimizing the capacity of the railway corridor. The analysis is carried out using the Terzo Valico dei Giovi as a case study, which represents the first Italian High Speed/Capacity line where a truly mixed use of the railway infrastructure for both passenger and freight services is envisaged. The study has been developed by examining different scenarios of mixed traffic circulation through the application of UIC capacity assessment approaches, based on the evaluation of headways, occupation times and timetable stability margins, in line with the principles defined in UIC Leaflet 406. This process leads to the definition of an operational timetable for the line and to the quantification of the impacts on the available line capacity, as well as on train travel times and overall operational performance. The results show that freight capacity is highly sensitive to train mass, dropping from 160 paths (800 t) to 48 paths in other cases. The UIC 406 compression analysis confirms that on high-speed lines, freight train performance and traffic heterogeneity are the main determinants of capacity saturation, as heavier trains significantly increase infrastructure occupation time and quickly consume bottleneck capacity despite temporal separation and advanced signaling systems.
Keywords:
mixed train traffic, high speed railway line, line capacityHow to Cite
European Court of Auditors. (2018). A European high-speed rail network: Not a reality but an ambition. https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications?did=46398
Fumasoli, T., Bruckmann, D., Weidmann, U. (2015). Operation of freight railways in densely used mixed traffic networks – An impact model to quantify changes in freight train characteristics. Research in Transportation Economics, 54, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.021
Hawken, J. (2014). Can high speed trains and freight services share same tracks? Turkish Railway Journal and Review. https://railturkey.org/2014/12/18/high-speed-and-freight-trains-on-same-line/
International Union of Railways. (2012). Mixed traffic on high-speed lines: Technical and operational issues. UIC.
Li, S., Zhu, X., Shang, P., Li, T., & Liu, W. (2023). Optimizing a shared freight and passenger high-speed railway system: A multi-commodity flow formulation with Benders decomposition solution approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 172, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2023.03.012
López-Pita, A., & Robusté, F. (2001). Compatibility and constraints between high-speed passenger trains and traditional freight trains. Transportation Research Record, 1742(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.3141/1742-03
Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti. (n.d.). https://terzovalico.mit.gov.it/il-terzo-valico/linea-del-terzo-valico/
Myronenko, V., & Hrushevska, T. (2018). Problems of passenger and freight trains combined traffic on high-speed railway lines. Transport Economics and Logistics, 76, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.26881/etil.2018.76.08
Myronenko, V., & Matsiuk, V. (2018). Rational distribution of the high-speed railway capacity between trains of various categories. Transport Economics and Logistics, 76, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.26881/etil.2018.76.07
Ruvio, A., Mortelliti, N., & Orchi, S. (2022, June). A review on rail transport in Europe and Italy. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope54979.2022.9854799
Strale, M. (2016). High-speed rail for freight: Potential developments and impacts on urban dynamics. The Open Transportation Journal, 10, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801610010057
Sutrai Erakuntza Foundation. (2016). High-speed rail and freight transport: Technical and economic con-straints in Spain. Sutrai Erakuntza Foundation.
UIC Code 406. (2013). Capacity (2nd ed.). UIC.
Urbański, P., Gallas, D., & Stachowicz, A. (2022). Analysis of the selection of the auxiliary drive system for a special purpose hybrid rail vehicle. Rail Vehicles/Pojazdy Szynowe, 2022(1–2), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.53502/RAIL-149405
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nordic Geodetic Commission
International Federation of Surveyors
European Sustainable Energy Innovation Alliance
New European Bauhaus Academy
The Lithuanian Roads Association
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association
Bentley
AB "Kauno tiltai"
UAB "Kerista"
UAB "Danfoss"
UAB "EMP recycling"
UAB "ACO Lietuva"
UAB "Arginta"
UAB "Skadec LT"
UAB "GPS partneris"
UAB "Hnit-Baltic"
AB "Eurovia Lietuva"
VšĮ "RV Agentūra"
UAB "GeoNovus"