Hydraulic configuration analysis of chiller-based cooling systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.2250Abstract
Hydraulic imbalance in chilled water systems remains one of the most underestimated causes of reduced cooling capacity, degraded part-load efficiency, and excessive energy consumption in commercial buildings. Although modern chillers, variable-speed drives, and advanced control algorithms have significantly improved nominal equipment efficiency, real plant performance is frequently constrained by improper flow distribution, uncontrolled mixing, and degradation of the system temperature difference (ΔT) under partial load operation. This study applies a comparative analytical methodology to investigate the relationship between hydraulic configuration, return water temperature, and chiller efficiency in three commonly used chilled water system concepts: constant primary and secondary flow, constant primary and variable secondary flow (primary–secondary), and variable primary flow systems. The analysis focuses on hydraulic interaction between production and distribution circuits, ΔT behavior, flow stability, and chiller loading under full-load and part-load conditions. Using a representative annual cooling load duration profile and a 500 kW chiller as a reference case, seasonal energy consumption and efficiency trends are quantified. The results demonstrate that constant-flow systems are inherently prone to low-ΔT syndrome, while primary–secondary systems remain sensitive to hydraulic decoupler mixing. Variable primary flow systems consistently maintain higher return temperatures, enable effective hydraulic unloading, and achieve the lowest annual electricity consumption. The findings confirm that hydraulic design and flow control strategy are decisive factors for seasonal chiller efficiency, exceeding the influence of nominal chiller performance ratings.
Keywords:
chiller plants, hydronic imbalance, hydraulic balancing, mixing loops, primary–secondary systems, variable primary flow, low-ΔT syndrome, constant flowHow to Cite
Arifin, Z., Fachruroji, F., & Huda, M. (2023). Increasing performance of chiller systems in high-rise buildings by load optimization. International Journal of Applied Power Engineering, 13(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijape.v13.i1.pp113-122
Chen, Z., Chen, Y., & Yang, C. (2022). Impacts of large chilled water temperature difference on thermal comfort, equipment sizes, and energy-saving potential. Journal of Building Engineering, 49, Article 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104069
Cheng, Q., Wang, S., Yan, C., & Xiao, F. (2015). Probabilistic approach for uncertainty-based optimal design of chiller plants in buildings. Applied Energy, 185, 1613–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.097
Danfoss. (2014). Hydronic analyzer tests proof: Significant savings on energy costs—Renovation of the Sunway Resort Hotel in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia [Case study].
Danfoss. (2020). Cooling load application guide: How to design balancing and control solutions for energy-efficient hydronic applications in residential and commercial buildings.
Gao, D., Wang, S., Shan, K., & Yan, C. (2015). A system-level fault detection and diagnosis method for low delta-T syndrome in complex HVAC systems. Applied Energy, 164, 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.025
Hinkelman, K., Johansson, D., Karlsson, J., & Widén, J. (2021). A case study on condenser water supply temperature optimization with a district cooling plant. In Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings (pp. 587–596). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp21181587
Kumar, S., Nielsen, S., Østergaard, P. A., & Möller, B. (2021). National district cooling potential study for India. Technical University of Denmark. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=dtu&id=dtu-26b3977b-29dc-431f-b6b2-89fe792a3493
Liu, X., Xu, J., Bi, M., Ma, W., Chen, W., & Zheng, M. (2024). Multivariate coupled full-case physical model of large chilled water systems and its application. Energy, 298, Article 131315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131315
Niu, J., Zhou, R., Tian, Z., Zhu, J., Lu, Y., & Ma, J. (2023). Energy-saving potential analysis for a 24-hour operating chiller plant using the model-based global optimization method. Journal of Building Engineering, 69, Article 106213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106213
Retezan, A., & Ehrenberg, S. G. (2019). Optimising the number of pumps and balancing valves in chilled water distribution systems. E3S Web of Conferences, 111, Article 01071. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911101071
Sullivan, G., Pugh, R., Melendez, A. P., & Hunt, W. D. (2010). Operations & maintenance best practices: A guide to achieving operational efficiency (Release 3). U.S. Department of Energy. https://doi.org/10.2172/1034595
Thangavelu, S. R., Myat, A., & Khambadkone, A. M. (2017). Energy optimization methodology of multi-chiller plant in commercial buildings. Energy, 123, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.116
Van den Brink, A., Walker, S., Kramer, R., & Zeiler, W. (2023). Low delta-T syndrome in cooling systems: A systematic review of the signs, symptoms, and causes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 236, Article 121465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121465
Wan, H., Gong, Y., Wang, S., Sun, Y., Xu, T., & Huang, G. (2024). Generic load regulation strategy for enhancing energy efficiency of chiller plants. Building Simulation, 17, 1273–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1138-1
Zafar, M., & Özçelik, S. (2024). Comparative evaluation of PID, MPC and fuzzy logic control strategies for energy transfer stations in district cooling networks. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202412.0796.v1
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nordic Geodetic Commission
International Federation of Surveyors
European Sustainable Energy Innovation Alliance
New European Bauhaus Academy
The Lithuanian Roads Association
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association
Bentley
AB "Kauno tiltai"
UAB "Kerista"
UAB "Danfoss"
UAB "EMP recycling"
UAB "ACO Lietuva"
UAB "Arginta"
UAB "Skadec LT"
UAB "GPS partneris"
UAB "Hnit-Baltic"
AB "Eurovia Lietuva"
VšĮ "RV Agentūra"
UAB "GeoNovus"