Towards sustainable rail mobility: emission reduction strategies for modern rail operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.1509Abstract
Railway systems represent a cornerstone of sustainable transportation, providing an environmentally efficient means of moving both people and goods. Their ability to deliver high transport capacity with comparatively low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, combined with their contribution to reducing road congestion, positions rail as a key pillar of modern low-carbon mobility. The ongoing electrification of rail networks further enhances these benefits by enabling the use of renewable electricity along increasingly extensive corridors. However, despite these advancements, diesel locomotives, still essential for shunting operations, regional services, and non-electrified routes, remain a significant source of environmental impacts. The resulting emissions negatively affect air quality and pose health and climate change concerns, particularly in densely populated or high-traffic railway areas. To meet tightening emission standards, the rail sector is advancing multiple decarbonization strategies, including full electrification, hybrid propulsion technologies, and the adoption of low-carbon fuels. Among these, advanced biofuels, such as biodiesel and Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) together with hydrogen used in fuel cell or combustion-based systems, are emerging as the most promising options. Building on established methodologies for assessing rail energy use and emissions, this study develops and applies a procedure for comparing the environmental burdens of conventional diesel traction with those associated with innovative propulsion and fuel solutions across a range of railway operations. The findings confirm that renewable fuels can substantially mitigate the climate impact of rail activities, while hydrogen-powered systems offer significant potential for deep and long-term decarbonization, particularly when supported by renewable energy sources. Nonetheless, the transition to hydrogen remains challenging due to the high energy requirements of its production, the need for dedicated storage and refuelling infrastructure, and uncertainties linked to large-scale deployment. These factors highlight the necessity of a comprehensive Well-to-Wheel (WTW) assessment to fully evaluate the environmental performance of emerging alternatives and ensure that their adoption results in genuine sustainability gains.
Keywords:
sustainable rail transport, low-carbon fuels, hydrogen propulsionHow to Cite
Ababneh, H., & Hameed, B. H. (2022). Electrofuels as emerging new green alternative fuel: A review of recent literature. Energy Conversion and Management, 254, Article 115213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115213
Ahmed, H., Adebayo, P., Ahmed, M., & Arbab, A. I. (2023). Hydrogen Fuel Cell technology: Benefits, challenges, and future potential. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 13, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.7176/JETP/13-1-06
Ahsan, N., Hewage, K., Razi, F., Hussain, S. A., & Sadiq, R. (2023). A critical review of sustainable rail technologies based on environmental, economic, social, and technical perspectives to achieve net zero emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185, Article 113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113621
Boulter, P. G., & McCrae, I. S. (Eds.). (2007). ARTEMIS: Assessment and reliability of transport emission models and inventory systems (report PPR350). TRL Limited. https://www.trl.co.uk/uploads/trl/documents/PPR350.pdf
Ban, L., Wu, D., Sun, D., Zhou, H., Wang, H., Zhang, H., Xu, C. C., & Yang, S. (2025). Sustainable production of biofuels from biomass feedstocks using modified montmorillonite catalysts. ChemSusChem, 18(1), Article e202401025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202401025
Bičáková, O., & Straka, P. (2012). Production of hydrogen from renewable resources and its effectiveness. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(16), 11563–11578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.047
D’Acierno, L., De Matteis, L., & Stefanelli, R. (2025). Adoption of hydrogen in railway traction: Opportunities and limits in the case of non-electrified railway lines. Transportation Research Procedia, 90, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.06.044
D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Giannini, M., & Nizami, A.-S. (2024). Environmental implications and levelized cost analysis of E-fuel production under photovoltaic energy, direct air capture, and hydrogen. Environmental Research, 246, Article 118163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118163
Di Blasio, G., Ianniello, R., & Beatrice, C. (2022). Hydrotreated vegetable oil as enabler for high-efficient and ultra-low emission vehicles in the view of 2030 targets. Fuel, 310, Article 122206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122206
European Environment Agency. (2023). EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023 (pp. 1–23). https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2023.
Eurostat. (n.d.). Electrified railway lines, 2023. ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/statistics_explained/maps/transport/electrified-railway-lines-2023.html
Falchetta, M. (2014). Fonti rinnovabili e rete elettrica in Italia: Considerazioni di base e scenari di evoluzione delle fonti rinnovabili elettriche in Italia (RT/2014/8/ENEA). Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l’Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile.
Giunta, M., & Marino, C. (2026). Sustainable railways and the impact of freight trains: The case study of the shunting area of the Strait of Messina. In Sustainable landscapes across the Mediterranean (CrossMED 2024—V1). Interdisciplinary approaches in cultural landscape management in the built environment. Springer.
Hickman, J., Hassel, D., Joumard, R., Samaras, Z., & Sorenson, S. (1999). Methodology for calculating transport emissions. (Project report SE/491/98). Transport Research Laboratory.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2006). Chapter 2.3: Mobile combustion. In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (pp. 1–78). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
International Organization for Standardization. (2023). Greenhouse gases — Quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions arising from transport chain operations (ISO 14083:2023).
Kapetanović, M., Núñez, A., van Oort, N., & Goverde, R. M. P. (2024). Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of traction alternatives for regional railways. Energy Conversion and Management, 303, Article 118202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118202.
Kokkinos, N. C., & Emmanouilidou, E. (2023). Sustainable rail fuel production from biomass. In Transportation energy and dynamics (pp. 3–6). Springer Nature Singapore. https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/sustainable-rail-fuel-production-from-biomass/25483750.
Lindgreen, E., & Sorenson, S. C. (2005). Simulation of energy consumption and emissions from rail traffic evaluation traffic (report MEK-ET-2005-04). Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical Engineering. lindgreen_sorenson.pdf
Lo Vullo, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Palermo, V., & Bertoldi, P. (2022). Greenhouse gases emission factors for local emission inventories (EUR 31168 EN). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/776442
Portale Cartografico ePIR. (n.d.). Retrieved December 21, 2025, from https://epir.rfi.it/arcgis/apps/sites/#/epir
Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, A. K., & Sharma, M. (2023). Mapping the impact of environmental pollutants on human health and environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 255, Article 107325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107325
Piecyk, M., Cullinane, S., & Edwards, J. (2012). Assessing the external impacts of freight transport. In A. McKinnon, M. Browne, & A. Whiteing (Eds.), Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics (2 ed., pp. 31–50). Kogan Page Limited.
Younas, M., Shafique, A., Hafeez, A., Javed, F., & Rehman, F. (2022). An overview of hydrogen production: Current status, potential, and challenges. Fuel, 316, Article 123317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123317
Downloads
Published
Conference Event
Section
Copyright
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nordic Geodetic Commission
International Federation of Surveyors
European Sustainable Energy Innovation Alliance
New European Bauhaus Academy
The Lithuanian Roads Association
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association
Bentley
AB "Kauno tiltai"
UAB "Kerista"
UAB "Danfoss"
UAB "EMP recycling"
UAB "ACO Lietuva"
UAB "Arginta"
UAB "Skadec LT"
UAB "GPS partneris"
UAB "Hnit-Baltic"
AB "Eurovia Lietuva"
VšĮ "RV Agentūra"
UAB "GeoNovus"